linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: "Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ath9k: Make AR_SREV_5416() macro evaluate to true for AR9100
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:47:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B895AAA.6070700@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <133e8d7e1002270926p64cfd2b5uc4017bf0187c53c2@mail.gmail.com>

On 2010-02-27 6:26 PM, Björn Smedman wrote:
> The AR_SREV_5416() macro evaluates to false for AR9100 while the
> definitions for AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER() and
> AR_SREV_5416_22_OR_LATER() seem to assume AR9100 based chips fall
> under this category. For example the last line of
> 
> #define AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER(_ah) \
>         (((AR_SREV_5416(_ah)) && \
>          ((_ah)->hw_version.macRev >= AR_SREV_REVISION_5416_20)) || \
>          ((_ah)->hw_version.macVersion >= AR_SREV_VERSION_9100))
> 
> makes no sense if AR_SREV_5416(_ah) is false when
> (_ah)->hw_version.macVersion == AR_SREV_VERSION_9100.
I think this is wrong. The AR_SREV_xxxx macros typically point to a
specific chip generation, whereas the AR_SREV_XXXX_OR_LATER() point to
the chip generation or any later.
AR9100 is related to AR9160, but not AR5416, so AR_SREV_5416() should
return false for 9100 based devices.
If you look at the AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER macros, they do not assume
that AR_SREV_5416() evaluates to true for the
((_ah)->hw_version.macVersion >= AR_SREV_VERSION_9100) case, as it's
either (is 5416 && macRev >= 20) or macVersion > 9100

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27 17:26 [RFC] ath9k: Make AR_SREV_5416() macro evaluate to true for AR9100 Björn Smedman
2010-02-27 17:47 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-02-27 18:54   ` Björn Smedman
2010-02-27 19:09     ` Felix Fietkau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B895AAA.6070700@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).