From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Derek Smithies" <derek@indranet.co.nz>,
"Benoit PAPILLAULT" <benoit.papillault@free.fr>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
"Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>,
"Bob Copeland" <me@bobcopeland.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] minstrel_ht: new rate control module for 802.11n
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:31:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B93F109.2000607@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003071859.25848.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
On 2010-03-07 6:59 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 17:39:47 Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> here is an updated version of my minstrel_ht code. Since the last
>> version, I've added the following improvements:
>>
>> - Use accurate A-MPDU statistics from tx feedback
>> - Rewrite the sampling algorithm to optimize for good A-MPDU lengths
>> and faster throughput recovery
>> - Implement .rate_update to handle changes in HT capabilities or
>> channel bandwidth
>> - Remove the private tx flags hack
>>
>> With the new version, performance has improved visibly for HT40 in all
>> of my tests. I think it's getting closer to being ready for inclusion.
>> ---
> Just released carl9170 1.0.3.1 which now uses minstrel_ht.
>
> I found a few things, not sure if they are bugs in the driver
> or minstrel_ht code. (Patch attached, but added the comments
> as a response to the code)
Thanks. How well does it perform in your tests compared to the old rc?
> on startup, carl9170 complains about non-aggregated
> (CTL_AMPDU not set) MCS frames. I had to add an
> alternative path for these _early_ frames. They are
> now send with the "lowest" legacy rate and aren't
> rejected by the driver/HW.
Why does it complain - is that a driver thing or does the hardware
really refuse it? I didn't see anything in the standard that mandates
the use of A-MPDU with MCS rates.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-07 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-07 16:39 [RFC v2] minstrel_ht: new rate control module for 802.11n Felix Fietkau
2010-03-07 17:59 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-03-07 18:31 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-03-08 14:31 ` Christian Lamparter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B93F109.2000607@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=derek@indranet.co.nz \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).