From: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
To: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
rt2x00 Users List <users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: rt2800lib: disable HT40 for now as it causes reception problems
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:21:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD1BAF8.1060908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004231505.29689.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
On 04/23/10 15:05, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Disable HT40 support for now as it causes rx problems with HT40 capable
> 11n APs (when mac80211 enables HT40, rx is completely disfunctional).
>
> Once the rt2800 HT code is capable of using HT40 we should enable the
> flag again.
>
> I only tested this patch with a rt305x SoC device, nevertheless the
> patch disables HT40 also on PCI and USB rt2800 devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
I can confirm that this also helps for PCI and USB devices.
With this patch applied all my rt28xx and rt30xx based devices starting working correctly.
So, definately,
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Using this patch I was able to associate a rt305x SoC device with my 11n
> capable AP using WPA and the connection basically works although I see lots
> of retried frames when sniffing the wireless traffic.
>
> If someone already had success with rt2800 and HT40 capable APs we should
> consider to only conditionally unset the HT40 flag for 305x SoC devices.
>
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> index 2648f31..aa02ff6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> @@ -2318,8 +2318,11 @@ int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> else
> spec->ht.ht_supported = false;
>
> + /*
> + * Don't set IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40 for now as it causes
> + * reception problems with HT40 capable 11n APs
> + */
> spec->ht.cap =
> - IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40 |
> IEEE80211_HT_CAP_GRN_FLD |
> IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20 |
> IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 13:05 [PATCH] rt2x00: rt2800lib: disable HT40 for now as it causes reception problems Helmut Schaa
2010-04-23 15:21 ` Gertjan van Wingerde [this message]
2010-04-23 18:08 ` Ivo van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD1BAF8.1060908@gmail.com \
--to=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).