From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: Jouni Malinen <jouni.malinen@atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:13:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD896F7.5090703@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272438045.2772.6.camel@jm-desktop>
Jouni Malinen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:08 -0700, Benoit Papillault wrote:
>
>> +static int ath9k_get_survey(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int idx,
>> + struct survey_info *survey)
>>
>
>
>> + struct ieee80211_conf *conf = &hw->conf;
>> +
>> + if (idx != 0)
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> + survey->channel = conf->channel;
>>
>
> Are there any plans on providing this information from all channels? I
> have assumed that the survey command was supposed to be used for
> surveying all channels (e.g., to get information for auto-channel
> selection) and returning something for the current channel is quite
> limited subset of that. In other words, I would like to be able to run a
> scan of all channels and then use NL80211_CMD_GET_SURVEY to fetch
> additional per-channel information like noise (and also channel usage
> statistics in case of ath9k) from the scanned channels.
>
> - Jouni
>
Hi Jouni,
I dig into the source code to understand the use of "idx" and having the
value for all scanned channels sounds a good plan. However :
- when doing a normal scan (iw dev wlan0 scan), the noise floor
calibration is started in a special mode, so I don't know if the results
is accurate enought.
- the first calibration takes some times .... more than the scan itself.
So, you cannot get a valid value before switching to the next channel.
Anyway, how idx is supposed to be used? From 0 ... up to the callback
returning -ENOENT ?
Do we need to keep a table with noise for each channel and return those
where we have a value, in which case idx cannot be used as an index into
this table ?
Regards,
Benoit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-28 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-27 22:08 [PATCH] ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise Benoit Papillault
2010-04-27 22:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-04-28 7:00 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-04-28 8:01 ` kernel warning on 2.6.33 ath9k Xu, Martin
2010-04-28 14:04 ` John W. Linville
2010-04-29 0:39 ` Xu, Martin
2010-04-28 20:13 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD896F7.5090703@free.fr \
--to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=jouni.malinen@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).