linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: Jouni Malinen <jouni.malinen@atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:13:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD896F7.5090703@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272438045.2772.6.camel@jm-desktop>

Jouni Malinen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:08 -0700, Benoit Papillault wrote:
>   
>> +static int ath9k_get_survey(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int idx,
>> +			     struct survey_info *survey)
>>     
>
>   
>> +	struct ieee80211_conf *conf = &hw->conf;
>> +
>> +	 if (idx != 0)
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +	survey->channel = conf->channel;
>>     
>
> Are there any plans on providing this information from all channels? I
> have assumed that the survey command was supposed to be used for
> surveying all channels (e.g., to get information for auto-channel
> selection) and returning something for the current channel is quite
> limited subset of that. In other words, I would like to be able to run a
> scan of all channels and then use NL80211_CMD_GET_SURVEY to fetch
> additional per-channel information like noise (and also channel usage
> statistics in case of ath9k) from the scanned channels.
>
> - Jouni
>   
Hi Jouni,

I dig into the source code to understand the use of "idx" and having the 
value for all scanned channels sounds a good plan. However :

- when doing a normal scan (iw dev wlan0 scan), the noise floor 
calibration is started in a special mode, so I don't know if the results 
is accurate enought.

- the first calibration takes some times .... more than the scan itself. 
So, you cannot get a valid value before switching to the next channel.

Anyway, how idx is supposed to be used? From 0 ... up to the callback 
returning -ENOENT ?
Do we need to keep a table with noise for each channel and return those 
where we have a value, in which case idx cannot be used as an index into 
this table ?

Regards,
Benoit


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-28 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-27 22:08 [PATCH] ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise Benoit Papillault
2010-04-27 22:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-04-28  7:00 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-04-28  8:01   ` kernel warning on 2.6.33 ath9k Xu, Martin
2010-04-28 14:04     ` John W. Linville
2010-04-29  0:39       ` Xu, Martin
2010-04-28 20:13   ` Benoit PAPILLAULT [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BD896F7.5090703@free.fr \
    --to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
    --cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=jouni.malinen@atheros.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).