From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Philosophical question about channel selection
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:54:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE05F6B.3060705@lwfinger.net> (raw)
A question has been posed on the openSUSE wireless forum that I do not
know how to answer.
In a given neighborhood, there are 802.11g APs at roughly the same
strength on channels 1 and 10 (yes - 10). As this configuration ensures
that there are no clear channels, what would be the best choice? As I
see it, the options are ch 1 with interference across the full channel
width, ch 6 with interference only at the upper end, or ch 11. Which
would get the best throughput?
Thanks,
Larry
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 17:54 Larry Finger [this message]
2010-05-04 18:11 ` Philosophical question about channel selection Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE05F6B.3060705@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox