On 05/07/10 03:14, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>:
> 
>> When you get to this, you probably should use wireless-next-2.6
>> (or wireless-2.6) for the bisection.  The pulls from linux-2.6 in
>> wireless-testing make bisection much more painful than necessary
>> (as long as the problem is actually evident in the other kernels).
> 
> I know it's painful!
> 
>> You can use the 'master-<date>' tags as guidelines for matching
>> wireless-testing versions to representative wireless-next-2.6 (or
>> wireless-2.6) tree versions.
> 
> Thank you for the tips!
> 

Hi,

It might be that one of my recent patches broke this. Can you try the
attached patch?

---
Gertjan