linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Golle <daniel.golle@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org,
	ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [RFC] refactor ath9k_platform to sound sane for use in both ath9k and ath5k
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:48:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1F51A3.5000407@gmail.com> (raw)

I'm developing on OpenWrt to work with EEPROM-less ath5k mini-pci 
devices. This is needed to support the ar71xx-based Senao EAP7660D board 
which got two AR5413 modules soldered into its mini-pci slots. In the 
original Firmware, MAC addresses as well as calibration-data seems to be 
part of the firmware blob stored on the board flash.
See 
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2010-June/007366.html 
for the corresponding discussion on OpenWrt-devel.
Similarly to the way this happens for ath9k, I managed to get ath5k to 
use the MAC address and eeprom-data supplied by ath9k_platform_data.
Including ath9k_platform.h in ath5k-sources looks confusing as the name 
ath9k_platform suggests that the supplied ath9k_platform_info struct is 
specific to ath9k devices.
Consequently, I believe ath9k_platform.h should be renamed into 
ath_platform.h, the macro ATH9K_PLAT_EEP_MAX_WORDS into 
ATH_PLAT_EEP_MAX_WORDS and struct ath9k_platform_data should be 
refactored to be struct ath_platform_data.
Please let me know if you agree with this in theory; if yes, I'll start 
posting the patches to OpenWrt.

Cheers

Daniel

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-21 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-21 11:48 Daniel Golle [this message]
2010-06-21 18:02 ` [RFC] refactor ath9k_platform to sound sane for use in both ath9k and ath5k Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-23  2:02   ` Daniel Golle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C1F51A3.5000407@gmail.com \
    --to=daniel.golle@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).