From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
Cc: "Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>,
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24 bits or so
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C29DCC1.2060707@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C298DD2.8010704@free.fr>
On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote:
> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Björn Smedman wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm getting weird values from the debugfs file ieee80211/phy0/tsf: the
>>> value goes up and down rather randomly and only the lower 24 bits or
>>> so seem to ever be used (see below for details).
>>>
>>> The only thing running on phy0 is a single ap interface (and the
>>> monitor companion that hostapd sets up). I was expecting tsf to
>>> increase monotonically until all 64 bits had been used.
>>>
>>> For a moment I thought it might be the kernel snprintf (on mips)
>>> playing a trick on me so I tried the following patch. But the result
>>> is the same.
>> IMHO the most likely problem source is stuck beacons. Please compile the
>> driver with the debug option enabled and load it with
>> insmod ath9k debug=0x00000100
>>
>> - Felix
>
> Humm... I observed a similar behavior a while ago because only the 15
> lower bits of rstamp were used when being extended (but rstamp is 32
> bits in fact). If so, it has been fixed by Felix in the following commit :
Nope, different issue. The TSF extending applies only to rx timestamps,
however Björn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.
The Rx TSF timestamp is pretty much irrelevant in AP mode.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-29 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 22:31 ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24 bits or so Björn Smedman
2010-06-28 22:55 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-06-29 6:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Benoit Papillault
2010-06-29 11:45 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-06-29 21:23 ` Benoit Papillault
2010-06-29 15:20 ` Björn Smedman
2010-06-29 15:55 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-06-29 16:36 ` Björn Smedman
2010-06-29 16:52 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-06-29 17:32 ` Björn Smedman
2010-06-29 21:40 ` Björn Smedman
2010-06-29 21:54 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-06-29 22:50 ` Björn Smedman
2010-06-29 23:56 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C29DCC1.2060707@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).