From: David Gnedt <david.gnedt@davizone.at>
To: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: fix WEXT ioctl GIWFREQ for monitor interfaces
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C44DFBB.6070604@davizone.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimxBt7dPcZrmAihWq9UKs77qS0cnAxQXIY_55ci@mail.gmail.com>
Am 2010-07-19 23:06, schrieb Gábor Stefanik:
> (BTW, I say that a GIWFREQ on a monitor interface should always return
> the channel the PHY is tuned to at the moment when it is issued. Most
> tools seem to expect this behavior.)
I agree, that would be the expected behaviour.
I am not very familar with the entire wireless subsystem yet, but wouldn't that
imply a interface change in cfg80211 and mac80211 to add an "get_channel" function?
Because if the card is hopping channels (e.g. because of 2 station interfaces on
different channels), only the driver itself can tell what's really the current
channel.
Nevertheless a default implementation for this new "get_channel" can be written
at mac80211 level (or even cfg80211?), which tries to find the current channel
by looking at all virtual interfaces, so only mac80211 drivers which allow
multiple channels (and non-mac80211 drivers) need to implement it.
Regards,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 18:41 [PATCH] cfg80211: fix WEXT ioctl GIWFREQ for monitor interfaces David Gnedt
2010-07-19 20:12 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-07-19 20:27 ` Johannes Berg
2010-07-19 21:06 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-07-19 23:28 ` David Gnedt [this message]
2010-07-20 13:04 ` Johannes Berg
2010-07-20 16:49 ` Gábor Stefanik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C44DFBB.6070604@davizone.at \
--to=david.gnedt@davizone.at \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).