linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: "Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: improve aggregation throughput by using only first rate
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:41:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4DF2E8.7060502@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikcW5Gx6P2-6w_Vmeh7kEDGuEHcY=U_jbH3tYhT@mail.gmail.com>

On 2010-07-26 10:37 PM, Björn Smedman wrote:
> 2010/7/26 Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:
>> On 2010-07-26 9:23 PM, Björn Smedman wrote:
>>> 2010/7/26 Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:
>>> * When tx is aggregated most rate control probe frames end up inside
>>> aggregates and are never used for probing (effective probe frequency
>>> is divided by average aggregate length).
>> Nope, a probing frame never ends up inside an aggregate. It's always
>> sent out as a single frame, which is why I had to make the decision
>> about sending a probing frame more complex in minstrel_ht, compared to
>> minstrel - the previous 10% stuff was limiting aggregation size.
> 
> Ok, I must have jumped to conclusions. I looked quickly at the code
> and had the impression that it only cared about the RATE_PROBE flag if
> it was on the first subframe of the aggregate, and then I compared
> debug output from rc and xmit like this:
Oh, wait. It seems that you may be right after all. I think I was
remembering stuff from the wrong codebase again Well, at least what I
described is what I think the code should be doing ;)

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-26 17:10 [RFC] ath9k: improve aggregation throughput by using only first rate Björn Smedman
2010-07-26 17:44 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2010-07-26 19:23   ` Björn Smedman
2010-07-26 19:41     ` Felix Fietkau
2010-07-26 20:37       ` Björn Smedman
2010-07-26 20:41         ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-07-27  4:48       ` Ranga Rao Ravuri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C4DF2E8.7060502@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).