From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath9k: /proc/net/wireless always shows status of 0
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:17:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4E1784.3030702@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=qJXCxtMZcEm3VQT1s7ioJsdhj2kJzkgGSf3ND@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/26/2010 03:54 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> On 07/26/2010 12:49 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>>> This is with today's wireless-testing (with no extra hacks)
>>
>> Maybe a better question: In 2.6.31 you could mount debugfs at /debug
>> and get the state with:
>> cat /debug/ieee80211/sta0/state
>
> debugfs is not static API. In fact that's a big reason why we use it.
> I considered defining a filesystem API for 802.11 using configfs but
> our priority is to first get nl80211 feature-complete with respect to
> wext, which we have completed now. But anyway, debugfs is *not* API
> and you should not rely on it, if you want to define API consider
> configfs.
>
>> It seems in .34 there is only phy0 info in debugfs. Or, am I
>> just not looking in the right place?
>>
>> I don't mind hacking code, but I'd appreciate a pointer to the
>> right part of the code if anyone has suggestions.
>
> The other thing you pointed out with wext, you should stop using wext
> and instead rely on nl80211. It is true that if you see something on
> /proc/net/wireless/ that was there before but not there now it is a
> regression and it should be addressed. Not sure where the status crap
> comes from on wext.
I really don't care what API I end up using..I am just looking for some
way to report to users whether the STA is in the various states that
used to be defined as something similar to:
enum ieee80211_state {
IEEE80211_UNINITIALIZED = 0,
IEEE80211_INITIALIZED,
IEEE80211_ASSOCIATING,
IEEE80211_ASSOCIATED,
IEEE80211_AUTHENTICATING,
IEEE80211_AUTHENTICATED,
IEEE80211_SHUTDOWN
};
I have been reading the net/wireless code, but so far I don't see
any state machine type logic where this state might be kept. Maybe
it would have to be inferred from something else?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 19:49 ath9k: /proc/net/wireless always shows status of 0 Ben Greear
2010-07-26 22:00 ` Ben Greear
2010-07-26 22:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-26 23:17 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-07-26 23:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-26 23:36 ` Ben Greear
2010-07-26 23:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-27 6:48 ` Johannes Berg
2010-07-27 6:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-27 16:20 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4E1784.3030702@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).