From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nbd.name ([88.198.39.176]:41263 "EHLO ds10.nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752680Ab0HBI7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:59:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4C5688F7.1070200@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:59:35 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: Bruno Randolf , johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cfg80211: Add nl80211 antenna configuration References: <20100729035820.5930.29864.stgit@tt-desk> <201007291812.28639.br1@einfach.org> <201008021313.54850.br1@einfach.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2010-08-02 7:37 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > I'm not, the point I was trying to make is that solving this for > legacy and that for 802.11n this needs more thought and work. I need this for 802.11n as well, and I believe the API is good enough for that. >> as long as the API is flexible >> enough i think it can be added later as 802.11n devices are going to accept >> antenna configuration. > > If you want really flexible stuff without addressing serious > considerations before introducing a new kernel API then use debugfs. I'd like to see this in nl80211. Is there any specific concern left that I haven't addressed already? If so, please point me at it... - Felix