From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: Allow multiple STA connected to same AP.
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:03:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8959BC.7040501@candelatech.com> (raw)
With the patch below against latest wireless-testing, I can create two
STA on the same ath9k phy0 and have them send traffic to each other.
I tested only un-encrypted STAs at this point.
It seems the tx logic hangs after a bit, so there are still issues, but
I'm not sure if that is something introduced by my patch or some
existing ath9k bug.
Please let me know if this is a viable approach.
Thanks,
Ben
diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
index 4935b84..21401c9 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/main.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ void ieee80211_configure_filter(struct ieee80211_local *local)
u64 mc;
unsigned int changed_flags;
unsigned int new_flags = 0;
+ int avifs = 0;
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
if (atomic_read(&local->iff_promiscs))
new_flags |= FIF_PROMISC_IN_BSS;
@@ -78,6 +80,22 @@ void ieee80211_configure_filter(struct ieee80211_local *local)
/* be a bit nasty */
new_flags |= (1<<31);
+ /* If we have more than one virtual station, turn on PROMISC_IN_BSS
+ * --Ben
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
+ if (!sdata->dev || !netif_running(sdata->dev))
+ continue;
+
+ if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
+ avifs++;
+ if (avifs > 1)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (avifs > 1)
+ new_flags |= FIF_PROMISC_IN_BSS;
+
drv_configure_filter(local, changed_flags, &new_flags, mc);
WARN_ON(new_flags & (1<<31));
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
index 687077e..db751f1 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ int sta_info_insert_rcu(struct sta_info *sta) __acquires(RCU)
spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags);
/* check if STA exists already */
- if (sta_info_get_bss(sdata, sta->sta.addr)) {
+ if (sta_info_get(sdata, sta->sta.addr)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local->sta_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&local->sta_mtx);
rcu_read_lock();
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-09 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 22:03 Ben Greear [this message]
2010-09-09 22:51 ` RFC: Allow multiple STA connected to same AP Johannes Berg
2010-09-09 23:01 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-09 23:08 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-10 4:52 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-10 16:37 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-10 16:52 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8959BC.7040501@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).