From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:41354 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997Ab0IJWnI (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:43:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8AMh7Od022460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:43:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4C8AB47B.7090801@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:43:07 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: question on scanning and multiple VIFs. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm now debugging virtual stations with WPA. It's not working, and at least part of the problem appears to be that scanning on one STA causes others to think they are going offchannel, though in reality, I'm not sure the channel is actually being changed. I think the proper action would be to have scan happen only on the single channel if any of the VIFS are associated. In this case, nothing would go offchannel and a secondary STA wouldn't overly conflict with the others. Any ideas on a proper way to go about doing this? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com