From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k, multiple stations, and AMPDUs
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:56:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9B5C83.4000407@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285230831.3691.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 09/23/2010 01:33 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 21:58 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>
>> + * @addr2: local address (vif->sdata->dev->dev_addr). Can be NULL for 'any'.
>> *
>> * This function must be called under RCU lock and the
>> * resulting pointer is only valid under RCU lock as well.
>> @@ -2434,7 +2435,8 @@ struct ieee80211_sta *ieee80211_find_sta(struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>> * DO NOT USE THIS FUNCTION.
>> */
>> struct ieee80211_sta *ieee80211_find_sta_by_hw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>> - const u8 *addr);
>> + const u8 *addr,
>> + const u8 *localaddr);
>
> That's not going to generate proper documentation. Also, it now probably
> shouldn't be called "by_hw" any more.
I can't think of a better name, and it still does take the hw struct,
but if you have a suggestion you like better, I will use it.
I re-posted with the rest of the changes you suggested. Seems to
be working fine.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-23 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 5:25 ath9k, multiple stations, and AMPDUs Ben Greear
2010-09-21 10:10 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 12:08 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 12:19 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 12:24 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 12:31 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 17:25 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 18:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 18:04 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 18:06 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 19:28 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-21 19:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-21 20:19 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-21 22:41 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-22 4:33 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-22 8:31 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-09-23 4:58 ` Ben Greear
2010-09-23 8:33 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-23 13:56 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-09-23 14:05 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9B5C83.4000407@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).