Re: rebased version of wireless-testing?

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

On 09/24/2010 01:05 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:35:34PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> Is there a rebased version of wireless-testing, or is there a way to
>> tell git to not apply any patch that was later reverted when pulling?
>>
>> I'd like to pull wireless-testing changes into a tree based on linux-2.6,
>> but I want it clean enough to easily see what changes I actually
>> pulled in.
>>
>> If not, I can manually pull in some patches as needed.
>
> Don't do that -- wireless-testing is and likely always will be a mess.
> It really only exists as a "-next lite" for those that only want
> bleeding-edge wireless while keeping-up with linux-2.6 release
> candidates.
>
> You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
> wireless-2.6 as well).  The history there isn't always immutable
> (although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
> than wireless-testing.

Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6?

Thanks,
Ben

>
> John


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com