From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:60563 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754610Ab0I1NlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:41:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:41:22 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Finn Thain CC: trivial@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Randy Dunlap , Matt Turner , Dimitry Torokhov , Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel. References: <1285647599-14719-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <4CA193B6.8020503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/28/2010 12:35 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> o.k... I'll make the changes to the arch patch, and combine the two, and >> send it to jiri.. > > Why? > > My advice is don't do it unless you want to waste reviewers' time. > >> as for the names and signed offs is what is below fine or do I need to >> change some of them? > > If you combine patch 1 and patch 2 and submit that as patch 3, you will > likely have to CC patch 3 to everyone to whom you sent patch 1 plus > everyone to whom you sent patch 2. You must also change any "acked-by" to > "Cc", since patch 3 is new. > > Keep the same CC list since Jiri is already on it ("trivial@kernel.org"). > > Finn > alright.. so it will be two patches then..(not the best at the CC etc.. thing) cool... and thanks again for reviewing this for me..(back breaking work, but somebodies _gots_ to do it..) Justin P. Mattock