From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:61167 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932243Ab0JDS51 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4CAA2397.9050400@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:57:27 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-wireless , linux-bluetooth , Bob Copeland , Pavel Machek , linux@brodo.de Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 References: <-jYMINoCtaK.A.F5.8CPqMB@chimera> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/04/2010 11:35 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Below are the 802.11 and Bluetooth ones: > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Unresolved regressions >> ---------------------- > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19392 >> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c:3475 ath5k_bss_info_changed+0x44/0x168 [ath5k]() >> Submitter : Justin Mattock >> Date : 2010-09-28 22:30 (6 days old) >> Message-ID : >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128571307018635&w=2 > > WTF -- this ended up in a bisect pointing to some PCMCIA patch! Justin: > > * does this happen with wireless-testing.git ? no this is the current Linus tree(have not tried any other tree). as for the unresolved regression, this just was filed a few days ago.. > * Did you do the bisect on the entire kernel? What git tree are you > using to bisect? > the bisect had to be between 2.6.34 and 2.6.32 due to pcmcia breaking after 2.6.34(there is a bug report for that, but got resolved) > Did you simply bring up the interface and then suspsend? Did you not > add a new interface in between this? ath5k's add_interace has: > > if (sc->vif) { > ret = 0; > goto end; > } > > But why does it just allow this to go through without complaining if > multiple vifs are not supported? > > the system is opensuse 11.2, I just simply start the machine boot up, after nm connects I open a terminal then suspend in the terminal, upon wakeup this message appears. >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061 >> Subject : 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression >> Submitter : Pavel Machek >> Date : 2010-08-21 15:24 (44 days old) >> Message-ID :<20100821152445.GA1536@ucw.cz> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2 > > I see no updates to this since August. There are boat load of PCMCIA > changes recently, is bisect possible here? > > yeah the first pcmcia bug I hit with this machine was back in may/june ended up doing a bisect for that(which was painful due to a slow machine)which ended up getting fixed.(never thought to check s2ram after that) as for bluetooth the only issue I have with that is for my other machines which is hitting this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/1/61 (but have not had a chance to follow through due to doing the update broken web addresses in the kernel) >> Regressions with patches >> ------------------------ > > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722 >> Subject : 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed >> Submitter : Thomas Meyer >> Date : 2010-08-31 20:14 (34 days old) >> Message-ID :<201008312214.52473.thomas@m3y3r.de> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128328580504227&w=2 >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg140769.html >> Handled-By : Florian Mickler >> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=31671 > > This seems fixed. > > Luis > alright if this is with the latest wireless tree, then I can throw that in to verify that it is indeed fixed.. Justin P. Mattock