From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc1 (libipw remove_proc_entry warning)
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:06:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD48E04.2050709@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimnHFHJq13xpJ0ZgLmpd+cHmHH5sQ4HWtL_MrMT@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/05/10 15:24, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This bug seems to be due to commit 27ae60f8f7aac ("ipw2x00: replace
> "ieee80211" with "libipw" where appropriate"), where Pavel did this:
>
> - libipw_proc = proc_mkdir(DRV_NAME, init_net.proc_net);
> + libipw_proc = proc_mkdir("ieee80211", init_net.proc_net);
>
> but then the cleanup was kept as
>
> remove_proc_entry(DRV_NAME, init_net.proc_net);
>
> in both places (both in the failure case and in the unload case). The
> error string is also total crap, and says
>
> "Unable to create " DRV_NAME " proc directory\n");
>
> Even though it doesn't actually create a proc directory named DRV_NAME at all.
>
> So that patch looks like total and utter crap to me. The commit message says
>
> "Keep /proc/net/ieee80211 under the original name to avoid breaking user
> interface."
>
> but the thing is, it really didn't fix anything but that one create
> thing. It needs to fix all the other cases too.
>
> Totally UNTESTED patch attached. It may or may not compile. And maybe
> it doesn't catch all cases, but it should catch the obvious ones.
That works for me.
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
thanks,
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-05 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTimr3rW67HxgOUyReEW8dmmSsd4b7-Ns57mXzS1w@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-03 23:18 ` Linux 2.6.37-rc1 (libipw remove_proc_entry warning) Randy Dunlap
2010-11-05 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-05 23:06 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2010-11-05 23:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-08 21:33 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD48E04.2050709@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).