From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath5k/mac80211: Reproducible deadlock with 64-stations.
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:12:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDC7860.3070307@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDC354C.2060503@candelatech.com>
On 11/11/2010 10:26 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 11/11/2010 08:55 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 11/11/2010 01:27 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2010 02:02 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>> I don't really see any deadlock here... hmm. Tejun, do you see anything
>>>> wrong with the "locking" in workq stuff here?
>>>>
>>>> Something is holding the RTNL, and a bunch of other things are
>>>> trying to
>>>> acquire it. We don't really know who's holding it and who's
>>>> acquiring it
>>>> though.
>
> I notice that the system is consistently running OOM, even though
> it has 2GB RAM. I'll try disabling some of the memory-poisoning
> debugging that may
> be consuming excess amounts of RAM to see if that helps any.
The lockup (or extreme slowdown?) happens before the
serious memory pressure.
One thing I noticed is that at one point near (at?) the beginning
of the slowdown, it took 36-seconds to complete the
flush_work() call in ieee80211_do_stop in iface.c
From some printk's I added:
Nov 11 14:58:13 localhost kernel: do_stop: sta14 flushing work: e51298b4
Nov 11 14:58:49 localhost kernel: do_stop: sta14 flushed.
It is holding RTNL for this entire time, which of course stops
a large number of other useful processes from making
progress.
Is there any good reason for the flush to take so long?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 23:02 ath5k/mac80211: Reproducible deadlock with 64-stations Ben Greear
2010-11-11 0:57 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 1:03 ` Johannes Berg
2010-11-11 5:51 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 1:02 ` Johannes Berg
2010-11-11 9:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 16:55 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 18:26 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 23:12 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-11-12 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-12 10:15 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-12 18:06 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-12 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-12 18:34 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-12 17:18 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-12 0:48 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-12 2:37 ` Johannes Berg
2010-11-12 16:32 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-12 16:45 ` Johannes Berg
2010-11-12 17:37 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDC7860.3070307@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).