linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
	lrodriguez@atheros.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: try more than one tid when scheduling a new aggregate
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:43:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D36339F.3020506@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D363165.1010306@openwrt.org>

On 01/18/2011 04:33 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2011-01-19 1:26 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 01/15/2011 05:30 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> Sometimes the first TID in the first AC's list is not available for forming
>>> a new aggregate (the BAW might not allow it), however other TIDs may have
>>> data available for sending.
>>> Prevent a slowdown of other TIDs by going through multiple entries until
>>> we've either hit the last one or enough AMPDUs are pending in the hardware
>>> queue.
>>
>> I had attempted a similar patch, but I was thinking we should iterate
>> through all of the txq->axq_acq entries, not just use the first one?
>>
>> If you agree, I can merge my patch with your patch below
>> and re-post.
> My patch was merged, how about sending an incremental patch on top of it
> for review?

Right...I just wanted to make sure that it was a sane thing to do
before making the effort.

I'll try to get something posted soonish.

Thanks,
Ben

>
> - Felix
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


      reply	other threads:[~2011-01-19  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-15 13:30 [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: try more than one tid when scheduling a new aggregate Felix Fietkau
2011-01-15 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: fix excessive BAR sending when a frame exceeds its retry limit Felix Fietkau
2011-01-19  0:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: try more than one tid when scheduling a new aggregate Ben Greear
2011-01-19  0:33   ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-19  0:43     ` Ben Greear [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D36339F.3020506@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).