Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug

["Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>]

On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>> On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote:
>>>>>>   #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend;
>>>>> This does not do what you think it does.
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2]
>>>> brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two
>>>> patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are:
>>> You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email?
>>>
>>> {sigh}
>> Sorry.
>>> I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you
>>> want me to apply that one patch before yours?
>> I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you.
> Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+
> patches again on the list.
Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-)

Gr. AvS