From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:2402 "EHLO MMS3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751903Ab1ECNRO (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2011 09:17:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC00050.5000009@broadcom.com> (sfid-20110503_151717_710887_B00225BE) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:04 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Greg KH" cc: "Sukesh Srikakula" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug References: <1304406057-8722-1-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <1304406057-8722-3-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <20110503121522.GB22674@suse.de> <4DBFF628.6040502@broadcom.com> <20110503130049.GA29438@suse.de> <4DBFFE80.3030305@broadcom.com> <20110503131157.GA29915@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20110503131157.GA29915@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >>>> On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote: >>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) >>>>>> >>>>>> +extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend; >>>>> This does not do what you think it does. >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2] >>>> brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two >>>> patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are: >>> You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email? >>> >>> {sigh} >> Sorry. >>> I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you >>> want me to apply that one patch before yours? >> I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you. > Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+ > patches again on the list. Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-) Gr. AvS