Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug

["Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>]

On 05/03/2011 03:17 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>>> On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote:
>>>>>>>    #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend;
>>>>>> This does not do what you think it does.
>>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>>
>>>>> I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2]
>>>>> brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two
>>>>> patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are:
>>>> You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email?
>>>>
>>>> {sigh}
>>> Sorry.
>>>> I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you
>>>> want me to apply that one patch before yours?
>>> I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you.
>> Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+
>> patches again on the list.
> Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-)

Hi Greg,

I rebase and regenerated the patch files. Did a diff before resending 
them with the previous set and there are no relevant differences so the 
patches I sent this morning are ok.

Gr. AvS