From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:4317 "EHLO MMS3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752649Ab1ECNmB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2011 09:42:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC0061E.8020504@broadcom.com> (sfid-20110503_154205_380806_C36622B7) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:41:50 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Greg KH" cc: "Sukesh Srikakula" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug References: <1304406057-8722-1-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <1304406057-8722-3-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <20110503121522.GB22674@suse.de> <4DBFF628.6040502@broadcom.com> <20110503130049.GA29438@suse.de> <4DBFFE80.3030305@broadcom.com> <20110503131157.GA29915@suse.de> <4DC00050.5000009@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <4DC00050.5000009@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/03/2011 03:17 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >>> On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >>>>> On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote: >>>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend; >>>>>> This does not do what you think it does. >>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>> >>>>> I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2] >>>>> brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two >>>>> patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are: >>>> You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email? >>>> >>>> {sigh} >>> Sorry. >>>> I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you >>>> want me to apply that one patch before yours? >>> I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you. >> Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+ >> patches again on the list. > Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-) Hi Greg, I rebase and regenerated the patch files. Did a diff before resending them with the previous set and there are no relevant differences so the patches I sent this morning are ok. Gr. AvS