From: Mohammed Shafi <mshajakhan@atheros.com>
To: Vasanth Thiagarajan <Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com>
Cc: Mohammed Shajakhan <Mohammed.Shajakhan@Atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ath9k: make npending frames check as bool
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:09:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC7B63B.5030209@atheros.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110509092854.GC17465@vasanth-laptop>
On Monday 09 May 2011 02:58 PM, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:00:17AM +0530, Mohammed Shajakhan wrote:
>> On Friday 06 May 2011 09:45 PM, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:24:51PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
>>>> From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@atheros.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@atheros.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 7 +++++--
>>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>>> index 3de115d..2b78ea2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>>> @@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static void ath9k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool drop)
>>>> timeout = 1;
>>>>
>>>> for (j = 0; j< timeout; j++) {
>>>> - int npend = 0;
>>>> + bool npend = false;
>>>>
>>>> if (j)
>>>> usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>>>> @@ -2276,7 +2276,10 @@ static void ath9k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool drop)
>>>> if (!ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i))
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> - npend += ath9k_has_pending_frames(sc,&sc->tx.txq[i]);
>>>> + npend = ath9k_has_pending_frames(sc,&sc->tx.txq[i]);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (npend)
>>>> + break;
>>>
>>> We need not bail out as soon as there is a pending frame in a queue.
>>> There is a possibility that it could be transmitted successfully by
>>> the time the given timeout expires.
>>
>> Hi Vasanth,
>> the timeout is before we enter into the loop for checking pending
>> frames, so I thought it won't be affecting it. am I missing something?
>> please tell me.
>
> I meant the total timeout (200ms). Even though there are frames in
> tx queues after the given timeout for that particular queue, it is
> quite possible that those frames can be completed successfully by
> the time we are done with the waiting on the last queue.
Ok Vasanth.
thanks,
shafi
>
>
> Vasanth
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-09 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 15:54 [RFC] ath9k: make npending frames check as bool Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2011-05-06 16:15 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-05-09 4:30 ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-05-09 9:28 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-05-09 9:39 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-05-09 9:39 ` Mohammed Shafi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC7B63B.5030209@atheros.com \
--to=mshajakhan@atheros.com \
--cc=Mohammed.Shajakhan@Atheros.com \
--cc=Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).