From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Mike McCormack <mikem@ring3k.org>
Cc: chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn, linville@tuxdriver.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtl8192ce stability improvements
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:49:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDA9016.3090701@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDA66D5.2090801@ring3k.org>
On 05/23/2011 08:53 AM, Mike McCormack wrote:
> The following patch series is aimed at improving the stability
> of the rtl8192ce driver, with a bit of cleanup thrown in.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> Mike McCormack (8):
> rtlwifi: Synchronize IRQ after disabling it
> rtlwifi: Remove set_rfpowerstate_inprogress
> rtlwifi: Store loop index in local variable
> rtlwifi: Run IPS leave work in a tasklet
> rtlwifi: Don't block interrupts in spinlocks
> rtlwifi: Assign rx buffer ownership to hardware last
> rtlwifi: Use write barrier when assigning ownership
> rtlwifi: Fix logic in rx_interrupt
>
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c | 45 +++++++++++---------------
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/phy.c | 12 ++----
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/trx.c | 2 +
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/phy.c | 2 -
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c | 14 ++------
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/wifi.h | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Thanks for your changes. I have not yet tested them, but I noticed a few points
that I want you to address.
Are you using wireless-testing for your patches? There are some patches pending
in John's queue, but your patches got offsets and fuzz in files that those
patches do not touch. Everything seemed to apply despite the fuzz and everything
compiled, but I always get nervous about patches with anything more serious than
offsets.
Patches 3, 4, 6 and 8 do modify driver rtlwifi, but patches 1 and 7 change
driver rtl8192ce. Similarly, #2 changes rtl8192ce, rtl8192cu, and rtl8192se, and
#5 changes rtl8192ce and rtl8192se. The subject line for the patch should
indicate the driver that gets modified. I usually do it as "rtlwifi: rtl8192ce:
blah-blah", etc. The rtlwifi is included even though it does not get changed by
the patch.
I do not see anything serious in the body of the patches and I expect that I
will be giving them an ACK, but I want to test first.
Thanks,
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-23 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-23 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] rtl8192ce stability improvements Mike McCormack
2011-05-23 16:49 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2011-05-24 13:35 ` Mike McCormack
2011-05-24 14:40 ` Larry Finger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-25 0:38 Mike McCormack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDA9016.3090701@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mikem@ring3k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).