linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: David Quan <David.Quan@atheros.com>,
	Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k 9380: All 5Ghz channels flagged as passive-scanning
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:48:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB38AE.1060600@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimxFnWezBE7WCBHyQjJcrZ3WuTwuQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/23/2011 03:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>  wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 02:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez<mcgrof@gmail.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> No. You can only do this by trying to take the card out of compliance
>>>> purposely or unknowingly in software.
>>>
>>> Oh and my point was that "regulatory hacks" fit this description.
>>
>> Ok.  I believe you are right in general, but I can't see how enabling
>> a device to work on a non-scanned channel can break something,
>
> If a card is world roaming, how else on earth without seeing a beacon
> will you know if you can initiate radiation on that channel?

I have a strong personal sense of location, and I'm 100% sure that
I'm in the US.  So, the the computer could listen to it's human
and just trust that I know WTF I am asking for!

It may currently be impossible for vendors to explicitly support
this due to regulatory domains that assume users are evil and/or
stupid and not to be trusted to know their current location,
but please don't pretend that receiving a beacon is rock solid
evidence of a channel's availability:  It only means that someone
else that set up the AP thinks it's available for use.

>> if it is perfectly legal and appropriate for there to be an AP on that
>> scanned channel.
>
> Agreed! In fact I'd go so far as to say that if you have multiple
> 802.11 cards they should be able to share the same beacon hints, and
> in fact -- this is what cfg80211 does ;)
>
>> In other words, if I change my Netgear to be on channel
>> 48, scanned it, and then created a VAP on that channel, that is OK with
>> un-hacked regdomain stuff, but if instead I change regdomain to 0x0
>> and use channel 48 without re-configuring my Netgear, somehow that
>> suddenly causes issues?
>
> For Atheros EEPROM 0x0 is designed for usage for the US:

Good..that's all I really wanted:  My NIC to support my
location w/out undue complaint or limitations.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-24  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 22:22 ath9k 9380: All 5Ghz channels flagged as passive-scanning Ben Greear
2011-05-23 11:28 ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-05-23 16:54   ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 18:39     ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 18:52       ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 19:26         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 20:09           ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 20:25             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 20:51               ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 20:59                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 21:19                   ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 21:28                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 21:38                       ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 21:42                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 21:46                           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-23 21:59                             ` Ben Greear
2011-05-23 22:15                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-24  4:48                                 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-05-24 11:33                                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-24 13:00         ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-05-24 13:11           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-24 13:18             ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-05-24 21:39               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-05-24 14:06             ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-05-24 14:08           ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-05-24 15:05             ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDB38AE.1060600@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=David.Quan@atheros.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).