From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:37517 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757222Ab1EXXdu (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 19:33:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4DDC404D.8030505@zytor.com> (sfid-20110525_013411_868724_81259095) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:33:33 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Boyd CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Intel Linux Wireless , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64 References: <1305244212-19183-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <4DDC232F.7080005@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <4DDC232F.7080005@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left > over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be > appropriate to push this through your tree? > I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better. Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin -hpa