From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mac80211: create a STA entry for a WDS interface after receiving a beacon
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:53:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE61A11.1070708@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306901843.3867.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 2011-06-01 6:17 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 22:22 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2011-05-31 10:06 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:39 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> >> On 2011-05-31 9:32 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:16 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> >> >> When a STA entry is created too early, a lot of essential information
>> >> >> required for rate control is missing.
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't understand how you can rely on beacons for WDS.
>> >> You usually set up WDS links between APs on the same channel, each
>> >> running both a normal AP vif and a WDS vif. The remote AP's beacons are
>> >> then used to detect the capabilities of the peer.
>> >
>> > I don't think we can rely on "usually" unless we also enforce that
>> > somehow. Otherwise this link will basically be dead. There's nothing
>> > that requires you to add WDS to an AP interface only after all.
>> I don't think using WDS without APs makes any sense. Since WDS alone
>> does not use beacons or probe requests, there's nothing else that would
>> ensure that rate information, HT capabilities, etc. get exchanged.
>
> I just don't like the fact that you can create a non-functional WDS
> interface by adding it when there's no AP interface.
Actually, I just noticed that ieee80211_assign_perm_addr forces you to
use the MAC address of an existing AP interface for a WDS interface,
same as for an AP VLAN interface. So the requirement to also have an AP
mode interface is not new.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 19:16 [PATCH 1/3] mac80211: remove the useless WLAN_STA_WDS station flag Felix Fietkau
2011-05-31 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mac80211: create a STA entry for a WDS interface after receiving a beacon Felix Fietkau
2011-05-31 19:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] mac80211: receive action frames for WDS interfaces Felix Fietkau
2011-05-31 19:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] mac80211: create a STA entry for a WDS interface after receiving a beacon Johannes Berg
2011-05-31 19:46 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-05-31 20:05 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-31 19:32 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-31 19:39 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-05-31 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-31 20:22 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-06-01 4:17 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-01 10:53 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2011-06-01 11:02 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-01 11:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-06-01 11:30 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-01 11:41 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-06-01 12:26 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-01 12:48 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-06-06 18:24 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE61A11.1070708@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).