linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: fix ethtool_get_regs() to work with zero length registers
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:58:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E26C2DC.8090208@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311161889.1041.11.camel@localhost>

On 07/20/2011 02:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 12:18 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> cfg80211 exports zero length register size as it currently only uses
>> struct ethtool_regs.version to export struct wiphy.hw_version.
> [...]
> 
> The ethtool_regs::version field represents the version of the register
> dump format.  This may or may not relate to a hardware version.
> 
> If you don't actually provide a register dump then don't implement this
> operation.

Then we have a problem as cfg80211 exports the hw version without any
register dumps:

static int cfg80211_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
{
	/* For now, return 0... */
	return 0;
}

static void cfg80211_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, struct
ethtool_regs *regs,
			void *data)
{
	struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;

	regs->version = wdev->wiphy->hw_version;
	regs->len = 0;
}

And this has been there a long time already. How cfg80211 should export
hw version if this is not a proper way?

Kalle

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20  9:18 [PATCH] ethtool: fix ethtool_get_regs() to work with zero length registers Kalle Valo
2011-07-20 11:38 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-07-20 11:58   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2011-07-20 14:36     ` John W. Linville
2011-07-21 17:46       ` Ben Hutchings
2011-07-21 17:54         ` [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Allow zero-length register dumps again Ben Hutchings
2011-07-21 22:25           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E26C2DC.8090208@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).