From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from server19320154104.serverpool.info ([193.201.54.104]:60682 "EHLO hauke-m.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260Ab1GVIYI (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 04:24:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2933A0.40200@hauke-m.de> (sfid-20110722_102419_252528_C5236C6B) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:24:00 +0200 From: Hauke Mehrtens MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , ralf@linux-mips.org, "John W. Linville" CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jonas.gorski@gmail.com, mb@bu3sch.de, george@znau.edu.ua, arend@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, bernhardloos@googlemail.com, arnd@arndb.de, julian.calaby@gmail.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] bcma: add support for embedded devices like bcm4716 References: <1310835342-18877-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens : >> This patch series adds support for embedded devices like bcm47xx to >> bcma. Bcma is used on bcm4716 and bcm4718 SoCs as the system bus and >> replaced ssb used on older devices. With these patches my bcm4716 >> device boots up till it tries to access the flash, because the serial >> flash chip is unsupported for now, this will be my next task. This adds >> support for MIPS cores, interrupt configuration and the serial console. >> >> These patches are not containing all functions needed to get the SoC to >> fully work and support every feature, but it is a good start. >> These patches are now integrated in OpenWrt for everyone how wants to >> test them. >> >> This was tested with a BCM4704 device (SoC with ssb bus), a BCM4716 >> device and a pcie wireless card supported by bcma. >> >> >> @Rafał: If you are fine with the bcma patches could you please give >> your Signed-off on them. >> >> @Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will be in linux-3.1. > > ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf > or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to > me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge > conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just > my POV. > Hi, Thank you for your reviewing. I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me. John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-) Hauke