Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
	mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: fix enabling interrupts after a hardware error interrupt
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:19:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E71A71F.60306@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2nsn2G645x00RCLpk7xvT8iBxr+RGN=mdCVAN9jkjKNh7M7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-09-15 9:14 AM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@openwrt.org>  wrote:
>>  The interrupt handler increases the interrupt disable refcount, so the
>>  tasklet needs to always call ath9k_hw_enable_interrupts.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau<nbd@openwrt.org>
>>  ---
>>    drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c |    9 +++++----
>>    1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>>  diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>  index 8a17cff5..a3c3316 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
>>  @@ -669,15 +669,15 @@ void ath9k_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>>          u32 status = sc->intrstatus;
>>          u32 rxmask;
>>
>>  +       ath9k_ps_wakeup(sc);
>
> this is done in ath_reset, is there any corner cases that I had missed ?
>
>>  +       spin_lock(&sc->sc_pcu_lock);
>
> spin_lock_bh(&sc->sc_pcu_lock) in ath_reset_internal, won't be a
> problem know, or should we need to move this lock
>
>>  +
>>          if ((status&  ATH9K_INT_FATAL) ||
>>              (status&  ATH9K_INT_BB_WATCHDOG)) {
>>                  ieee80211_queue_work(sc->hw,&sc->hw_reset_work);
>>  -               return;
>>  +               goto out;
>>          }
>>
>>  -       ath9k_ps_wakeup(sc);
>>  -       spin_lock(&sc->sc_pcu_lock);
>>  -
>>          /*
>>           * Only run the baseband hang check if beacons stop working in AP or
>>           * IBSS mode, because it has a high false positive rate. For station
>>  @@ -725,6 +725,7 @@ void ath9k_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>>                  if (status&  ATH9K_INT_GENTIMER)
>>                          ath_gen_timer_isr(sc->sc_ah);
>>
>>  +out:
>>          /* re-enable hardware interrupt */
>>          ath9k_hw_enable_interrupts(ah);
>
>
> this is done in ath_complete_reset, should we enable interrupts if
> some times ath9k_hw_reset fails?
> please correct me if I had understood wrongly. thanks!
ath9k_hw_enable_interrupts was changed to use refcounting to keep 
interrupts blocked. The interrupt handler increses the refcount, so the 
tasklet needs to decrease it. When a reset is issued, it starts by 
disabling interrupts, then re-enables them after completing the reset.
Disabling interrupts in the ISR, but not enabling them in the tasklet 
causes an imbalance which leaves interrupts disabled after the reset is 
done.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-15  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-14 19:23 [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: fix enabling interrupts after a hardware error interrupt Felix Fietkau
2011-09-14 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath9k: make beacon timer initialization more reliable Felix Fietkau
2011-09-14 19:23   ` [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ensure that rx is not enabled during a reset Felix Fietkau
2011-09-15  7:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: fix enabling interrupts after a hardware error interrupt Mohammed Shafi
2011-09-15  7:19   ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2011-09-15  7:57     ` Mohammed Shafi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E71A71F.60306@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox