From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:34168 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820Ab1JZTDX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:03:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.111] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p9QJ3MUG004031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4EA8597A.50609@candelatech.com> (sfid-20111026_210325_886708_85470263) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:03:22 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: a-MSDU question (bug in debugfs?) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This code from net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c appears to say that if the IEEE80211_HT_CAP_MAX_AMSDU is set, we are at value 3839, but elsewhere on the web it appears the opposite. Anyone know what is correct? I'm having no good luck finding an official document about this... PRINT_HT_CAP((htc->cap & BIT(11)), "Max AMSDU length: " "3839 bytes"); PRINT_HT_CAP(!(htc->cap & BIT(11)), "Max AMSDU length: " "7935 bytes"); Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com