From: Nicolas Cavallari <Nicolas.Cavallari@lri.fr>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Nicolas Cavallari <Nicolas.Cavallari@lri.fr>,
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] carl9170: Fix memory accounting when sta is in power-save mode.
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:01:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F479847.10906@lri.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330090741.3426.16.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 24/02/2012 14:39, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 14:34 +0100, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>> On 23/02/2012 19:51, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2012 19:08, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, February 23, 2012 06:27:59 PM Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>>>>> On 23/02/2012 17:52, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, February 23, 2012 04:53:34 PM Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>>>>>>> While this seems to fix my problem, there could still be problems remaining
>>>>>>> in this code path. Particularly carl9170_tx_status will do lots of things
>>>>>>> like incrementing counters and waking up mac80211 queues...
>>>>>> That should be alright. As a rule of thumb, for every call to
>>>>>> carl9170_tx_accounting [called by carl9170_op_tx tx handler]
>>>>>> we need to call carl9170_tx_status. If the station is still in
>>>>>> ps mode, mac80211 will cache the station's frames and sets
>>>>>> the TIM bits.
>>>>> Part of the reason i wrote this, is because, while this patch fixes the
>>>>> memory accounting problem and prevent the AP from stopping working, the
>>>>> powersaving station sometimes cannot communicate with the AP anymore
>>>>> (other stations can). The station uses ath9k, and is just really doing a
>>>>> background scan. The first traces that i have just indicate that the
>>>>> station entered powersave mode, then sends probe requests and probe
>>>>> requests directed to the AP, then sends authentication requests to the
>>>>> AP (?), but the AP does not respond to any of them...
>>>>>
>>>> Do you run an 802.11n ap on carl9170?
>>> No, it's a 802.11g currently.
>>> My current wild guess is that, the responses to those requests are
>>> somehow still queued ...
>>
>> And i was right...
>>
>> /*
>> * Ignore doze->wake transitions that are
>> * indicated by non-data frames, the standard
>> * is unclear here, but for example going to
>> * PS mode and then scanning would cause a
>> * doze->wake transition for the probe request,
>> * and that is clearly undesirable.
>> */
>> if (ieee80211_is_data(hdr->frame_control) &&
>> !ieee80211_has_pm(hdr->frame_control))
>> ap_sta_ps_end(sta);
>>
>> As (re)associations requests and Auth frames are not data frames,
>> mac80211 still considers that the station is still in powersave mode, so
>> it still queues frames, and even queues the responses to the auth
>> frames. Except that the station disassociated silently, and is trying to
>> re-associate after a short time.
>>
>> Shouldn't mac80211 transition the sta to "awake" when receiving
>> auth/assoc frames ?
>
> I don't think so, that would make us send frames to the station it no
> longer deserves to have. Hostapd should instead delete & re-create the
> station entry, I think?
>
> johannes
>
Hostapd already does that¹ ... after the association response is acked.
Will send a patch for hostapd then.
[¹] :
/*
* Remove the STA entry in order to make sure the STA PS state gets
* cleared and configuration gets updated in case of reassociation back
* to the same AP.
*/
hostapd_drv_sta_remove(hapd, sta->addr);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 15:53 [RFC] carl9170: Fix memory accounting when sta is in power-save mode Nicolas Cavallari
2012-02-23 16:52 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-02-23 17:27 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2012-02-23 18:08 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-02-23 18:51 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2012-02-24 13:34 ` Nicolas Cavallari
2012-02-24 13:39 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-24 14:01 ` Nicolas Cavallari [this message]
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-25 9:32 ` Jouni Malinen
2012-02-25 20:12 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-25 20:20 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-02-24 14:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-02-24 20:43 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-02-25 20:36 ` [PATCH -stable] carl9170: fix frame delivery if sta is in powersave mode Christian Lamparter
2012-02-27 12:00 ` Nicolas Cavallari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F479847.10906@lri.fr \
--to=nicolas.cavallari@lri.fr \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).