From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com>,
Raja Mani <rmani@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: Fix random system lockup
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:17:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4B9085.6080603@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328772432-21074-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com>
On 02/09/2012 09:27 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> From: Raja Mani <rmani@qca.qualcomm.com>
>
> The commit "ath6kl: Use a mutex_lock to avoid
> race in diabling and handling irq" introduces a
> state where ath6kl_sdio_irq_handler() would be waiting
> to claim the sdio function for receive indefinitely
> when things happen in the following order.
>
> ath6kl_sdio_irq_handler()
> - aquires mtx_irq
> - sdio_release_host()
> ath6kl_sdio_irq_disable()
> - sdio_claim_host()
> - sleep on mtx_irq
> ath6kl_hif_intr_bh_handler()
> - (indefinitely) wait for the sdio
> function to be released to exclusively claim
> it again for receive operation.
>
> Fix this by replacing the mtx_irq with an atomic
> variable and a wait_queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raja Mani <rmani@qca.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com>
I would really like to avoid using atomic variable if at all possible. I
was trying to think other options and what if we take in
ath6kl_sdio_irq_disable() mtx_irq before calling sdio_claim_host().
Wouldn't that solve the deadlock?
Kalle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 7:27 [PATCH] ath6kl: Fix random system lockup Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2012-02-27 14:17 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2012-02-28 5:28 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2012-02-28 7:57 ` Kalle Valo
2012-03-01 7:35 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4B9085.6080603@qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmani@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).