From: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Occasional truncated scan results
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4CE4D6.6020108@raritan.com> (raw)
Hi,
some time ago I had an issue with a wireless device that it couldn't
associate to the AP over some time. I found out that the BSS with the
corresponding SSID was the last in the scan list and was truncated - all
the IEs were missing and so the supplicant did not detect that it
supports WPA2 and hence ignored it.
After some playing with different wireless devices I discovered that
this is not limited to specific drivers so I digged a bit in the scan
code in net/wireless/scan.c and found the culprit: The scan result is
put together with the iwe_stream_* functions that place data into a
provided buffer if enough space is available in the buffer. Otherwise
the functions do just nothing. Before a BSS is added there is a check if
some minimum space is available but after the BSS has been added it is
not clear how many data actually has been placed into the buffer. So
especially (but not neccessarily only) the last BSS is prone to be
incomplete. I my case all the IEs were missing and this was persistent
over some time (the persitence behavior seems to differs between drivers
- probably depends on how the scanning is implemented).
Currently I implemented a heuristic that checks if some minimum space
(currently 256 bytes) is still free _after_ adding a BSS and otherwise
return -E2BIG so the user space can provide a larger buffer but this is
a crappy hack.
Can the code be changed in some way to more reliably detect if some data
did not fit into the buffer and report this to user space?
- ron
--
Ronald Wahl - ronald.wahl@raritan.com - Phone +49 375271349-0 Fax -99
Raritan Deutschland GmbH, Kornmarkt 7, 08056 Zwickau, Germany
USt-IdNr. DE813094160, Steuer-Nr. 227/117/01749
Amtsgericht Chemnitz HRB 23605
Geschäftsführung: Stuart Hopper, Burkhard Wessler
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 14:29 Ronald Wahl [this message]
2012-02-28 14:42 ` Occasional truncated scan results Johannes Berg
2012-02-28 15:15 ` Ronald Wahl
2012-02-28 15:24 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-28 15:35 ` Ronald Wahl
2012-02-29 8:36 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4CE4D6.6020108@raritan.com \
--to=ronald.wahl@raritan.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).