linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com,
	rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.3 1/4] Revert "ath9k_hw: Fix false tx hung detection in AR9003 chips"
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:24:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F552104.9000707@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120305193348.GE18128@tuxdriver.com>

On 2012-03-05 8:33 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-02-29 7:08 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:58:39PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> >> The approach of this change is flawed, as it triggers tx status processing
>> >> from more callsites, yet the chips only have one global tx status queue.
>> >> Subsequent patches will properly fix the issue that this one tried to address.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
>> > 
>> > How flawed is the current approach?  That commit looks like it has been
>> > around for months already.  Does it really _need_ to be fixed in 3.3?
>> It only slightly reduces the severity of the issue it tried to address,
>> while adding some ugly race conditions. It is not possible to properly
>> fix the issue without a revert of that commit, so I really would like to
>> see this patch series in 3.3.
> 
> I am happy to take this series for 3.4, but it seems quite late
> for 3.3.  We have been living with it for a while already.
OK, no problem. I'm using bleeding edge anyway ;)

- Felix

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27 18:58 [PATCH 3.3 1/4] Revert "ath9k_hw: Fix false tx hung detection in AR9003 chips" Felix Fietkau
2012-02-27 18:58 ` [PATCH 3.3 2/4] ath9k: do not call ath9k_hw_txprocdesc on AR9003 outside of the tx tasklet Felix Fietkau
2012-02-27 18:58   ` [PATCH 3.3 3/4] ath9k_hw: enable interrupts for beacon tx completion events Felix Fietkau
2012-02-27 18:58     ` [PATCH 3.3 4/4] ath9k: fix drv_tx_last_beacon on AR9003 by processing beacon tx status Felix Fietkau
2012-02-29 18:08 ` [PATCH 3.3 1/4] Revert "ath9k_hw: Fix false tx hung detection in AR9003 chips" John W. Linville
2012-02-29 18:24   ` Felix Fietkau
2012-03-05 19:33     ` John W. Linville
2012-03-05 20:22       ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2012-03-05 20:24       ` Felix Fietkau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F552104.9000707@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).