linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath9k:  Add more recv stats.
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:51:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7F1F13.8060003@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F7C652D.5050702@candelatech.com>

On 2012-04-04 5:13 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 05:01 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> 
>>> + * @rx_beacons:  No. of beacons received.
>>> + * @rx_frags:  No. of rx-fragements received.
>> Why should the driver keep track of those last two?
> 
> Well, for instance, I often see around 5Mbps of total rx bytes
> (as counted by the NIC), but much less transmitted.  And this is
> with stations sending to stations.
> 
> I was trying to figure out where the extra packets come from.  It
> seems beacons is a lot of it so it seemed worth counting.  And maybe
> fragments count towards that too since there would be more overhead???
> 
> As for rx-frags, just seemed useful to know how many frags
> were received.  My understanding is that this is like receiving
> 1/2 of a packet at a time...so if we wanted to know how many
> real packets the NIC received, we'd need to take frags v/s non-frags
> into account.  The current logic that counts 'all-packets' for
> the rx path is counting individual fragments, I think.
> 
> At least for beacons, as long as they are always passed up
> the stack, I can count them in the mac80211 layer instead if
> you prefer.
When you only need the packet type based counters for debugging stuff,
why not just create a monitor mode interface and count in user space?
I think that would make more sense, since these counters are irrelevant
for most users, and avoiding unnecessary work in the rx path is useful
for performance reasons.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-06 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-03 16:18 [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: Add more recv stats greearb
2012-04-04 12:01 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-04-04 15:13   ` Ben Greear
2012-04-06 16:51     ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-04-06 16:58       ` Ben Greear
2012-04-06 22:30         ` Adrian Chadd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F7F1F13.8060003@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).