From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 00:33:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC008BB.1020606@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334607462-5387-6-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
On 04/16/2012 10:17 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> Currently the radio disable state is only updated during initialization,
> and it's only checked against the internal world domain. This is
> unnecessary, as there are always valid channels against this domain.
> Instead, check whether any channels are enabled in the regulatory
> notifier and update the radio state accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c | 66 ++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> index fd5b807..590e8c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> @@ -681,46 +681,6 @@ brcms_c_channel_min_txpower_limits_with_local_constraint(
>
> }
>
> -/* Update the radio state (enable/disable) and tx power targets
> - * based on a new set of channel/regulatory information
> - */
> -static void brcms_c_channels_commit(struct brcms_cm_info *wlc_cm)
> -{
> - struct brcms_c_info *wlc = wlc_cm->wlc;
> - uint chan;
> -
> - /* search for the existence of any valid channel */
> - for (chan = 0; chan < MAXCHANNEL; chan++) {
> - if (brcms_c_valid_channel20_db(wlc->cmi, chan))
> - break;
> - }
> - if (chan == MAXCHANNEL)
> - chan = INVCHANNEL;
> -
> - /*
> - * based on the channel search above, set or
> - * clear WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE.
> - */
> - if (chan == INVCHANNEL) {
> - /*
> - * country/locale with no valid channels, set
> - * the radio disable bit
> - */
> - mboolset(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> - wiphy_err(wlc->wiphy, "wl%d: %s: no valid channel for \"%s\" "
> - "nbands %d bandlocked %d\n", wlc->pub->unit,
> - __func__, wlc_cm->world_regd->regdomain->alpha2,
> - wlc->pub->_nbands, wlc->bandlocked);
> - } else if (mboolisset(wlc->pub->radio_disabled,
> - WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE)) {
> - /*
> - * country/locale with valid channel, clear
> - * the radio disable bit
> - */
> - mboolclr(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static int
> brcms_c_channels_init(struct brcms_cm_info *wlc_cm,
> const struct country_info *country)
> @@ -766,7 +726,6 @@ brcms_c_channels_init(struct brcms_cm_info *wlc_cm,
> }
>
> brcms_c_quiet_channels_reset(wlc_cm);
> - brcms_c_channels_commit(wlc_cm);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1240,12 +1199,37 @@ static int brcms_reg_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> struct ieee80211_hw *hw = wiphy_to_ieee80211_hw(wiphy);
> struct brcms_info *wl = hw->priv;
> struct brcms_c_info *wlc = wl->wlc;
> + struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> + struct ieee80211_channel *ch;
> + int band, i, n_channels = 0;
>
> brcms_reg_apply_radar_flags(wiphy);
>
> if (request && request->initiator == NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_COUNTRY_IE)
> brcms_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(wiphy, request->initiator);
>
> + /* Disable radio if all channels disallowed by regulatory */
I think we need to validate the channels against our phy as well. See
brcms_c_channels_init().
> + for (band = 0; band < IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS; band++) {
> + sband = wiphy->bands[band];
> + if (!sband)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sband->n_channels; i++) {
> + ch = &sband->channels[i];
> +
> + if (!(ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED))
> + n_channels++;
could break here when a valid channel is found.
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (n_channels == 0) {
> + mboolset(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> + wiphy_err(wlc->wiphy, "wl%d: %s: no valid channel for \"%s\"\n",
> + wlc->pub->unit, __func__, request->alpha2);
> + } else {
> + mboolclr(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> + }
> +
> if (wlc->pub->_nbands > 1 || wlc->band->bandtype == BRCM_BAND_2G)
> wlc_phy_chanspec_ch14_widefilter_set(wlc->band->pi,
> brcms_c_japan_ccode(request->alpha2));
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-25 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 20:17 [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] brcm80211: smac: don't set up tx power limits during initialization Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:32 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] brcm80211: smac: always set channel specified by mac80211 Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:32 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] brcm80211: smac: clean up channel.c Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 17:17 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 11:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-27 11:53 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-29 12:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-29 13:03 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 17:18 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 12:17 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-29 13:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-29 16:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-31 14:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-31 17:49 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 18:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-05-26 17:18 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 12:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] brcm80211: smac: don't validate channels against internal regulatory data Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] brcm80211: smac: use current regulatory domain when checking whether OFDM is allowed Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:34 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:53 ` Seth Forshee
2012-04-19 19:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-19 19:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-04-30 17:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-01 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-01 16:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-25 22:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-05-26 6:38 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 7:19 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-05-26 17:17 ` Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC008BB.1020606@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).