From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Josef Semler <josef.semler@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4ABDF.7060105@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPsaeQNwWmAyzgGa3KjVv=nzwL3QHCDN-kHtaQWxKHOS4P+paA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-05-29 12:24 PM, Josef Semler wrote:
>
>
> 2012/5/26 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org>>
>
> Hi,
>
> If the device EEPROM states that it's a 2x2/3x3 device, it'll TX on
> two/three streams.
>
> If it's something like an AR9281 where it's physically a 1T2R stream
> device, that's what it'll transmit/receive on by default.
>
> If it's something like an AR9285 where it's physically a 1T1R stream
> device with antenna diversity, that's also what you get.
>
> If the device EEPROM lies though, well, that's a problem. :-)
>
> Installed OpenWRT für ubnt-nano on a Nanobridge. Well, NanoBridge should
> be 2x2 MIMO, but the device shows me AR7240 rev.2
> Is this a a EEPROM-lie and how can I correct it?
AR7240 is the CPU, not the wifi chip.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
[not found] ` <CAPsaeQPxh0Yd+GT3HbReAAtoPhKF2c3kOzgOPL6xK7NC=8J4qA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
[not found] ` <CAPsaeQNwWmAyzgGa3KjVv=nzwL3QHCDN-kHtaQWxKHOS4P+paA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC4ABDF.7060105@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=josef.semler@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).