From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, brudley@broadcom.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] brcmsmac: do not call brcms_c_chipmatch() for non PCI
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:03:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD49B12.9030705@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD0FBB5.6040008@broadcom.com>
On 06/07/2012 09:06 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 03:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>> On 06/06/2012 01:23 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2012 01:07 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>> brcms_c_chipmatch() just works for PCIe devices and returns false for
>>>> non PCIe devices. This stops brcms_ops_stop() from calling it when the
>>>> devices is not a PCIe device.
>>>
>>> Although this is true you may want to consider what this function
>>> provides. The intent is to have a more accurate filter to determine
>>> support the device by the driver, ie. more accurate than what is in the
>>> driver device table.
>>>
>>> So in brcms_c_chipmatch() we may want a host-type independent filtering
>>> and validate bcma_device_id, bcma_chipinfo, and possibly bcma_boardinfo.
>> I do not like this function at all. ;-)
>>
>> Are these restrictions in this function really needed? I would more like
>> to restrict it to something like core revs, which is done in the device
>> table and the phy types and versions. A restriction by chipid would also
>> be reasonable as some chips are needing some special workarounds, these
>> checks could also be done for SoCs.
>
> I look where the function came from and it is called in several places
> in our proprietary driver, which has a pretty coarse filter in the
> device table.
>
> The BCMA device table in brcmsmac is more finegrained and currently has
> entries for the different 80211 core revisions. However, the brcmsmac
> may have additional revision requirement for chipcommon and other cores
> inside the chip so this function may have it merits for checking that.
>
> Gr. AvS
>
Hi Arend,
ok, then I will extend it somehow to also handle the SoCs based on the
chip id and rev in that function.
Hauke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-10 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 23:07 [PATCH 00/18] brcmsmac: update to get SoCs working Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 01/18] brcmsmac: remove PCIE() makro Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 20:05 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:28 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-11 7:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-11 21:36 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 02/18] brcmsmac: remove PCI_FORCEHT() makro Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 20:12 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 03/18] brcmsmac: remove ai_get_buscore{type,rev}() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:17 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:48 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:36 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 04/18] brcmsmac: use container_of instead of cast Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:45 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 05/18] brcmsmac: remove ai_findcore() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:28 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 06/18] brcmsmac: remove si_pmu_init() and si_pmu_res_init() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 07/18] brcmsmac: remove si_pmu_spuravoid_pllupdate() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 08/18] brcmsmac: remove some redundant chip common workarounds Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 12:14 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 12:59 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 09/18] brcmsmac: use core id constants from bcma Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 10/18] brcmsmac: use chip and package " Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 11/18] brcmsmac: remove some unnessessacry casts and void pointer Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:46 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 12/18] brcmsmac: add a conditions for core rev 17 again Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 13/18] brcmsmac: add some workarounds for other chips again Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 10:03 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:45 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:34 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-08 11:31 ` Jonas Gorski
2012-06-08 16:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-08 17:49 ` Jonas Gorski
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 14/18] brcmsmac: extend xmtfifo_sz array Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 10:24 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:33 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:10 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-11 7:59 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-11 21:44 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 15/18] brcmsmac: fix DMA on SoCs Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:29 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 16/18] brcmsmac: do not call brcms_c_chipmatch() for non PCI Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:23 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:19 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:03 ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 17/18] brcmsmac: fix read in write_phy_reg Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:39 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 18/18] brcmsmac: handle non PCI devices in the phy code Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:00 ` Hauke Mehrtens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD49B12.9030705@hauke-m.de \
--to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).