From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
"Kan Yan" <kanyan@broadcom.com>,
"Pieter-Paul Giesberts" <pieterpg@broadcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:28:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD85D47.8070609@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338906849-26135-7-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
On 06/05/2012 04:34 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> Currently the radio disable state is only updated during initialization,
> and it's only checked against the internal world domain. This is
> unnecessary, as there are always valid channels against this domain.
> Instead, check whether any channels are enabled in the regulatory
> notifier and update the radio state accordingly.
>
> Reviewed-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c | 67 ++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> index 65ef60b..7182b58 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c
> @@ -1235,12 +1194,38 @@ static int brcms_reg_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> +
> + if (likely(ch_found)) {
> + mboolclr(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> + } else {
> + mboolset(wlc->pub->radio_disabled, WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE);
> + wiphy_err(wlc->wiphy, "wl%d: %s: no valid channel for \"%s\"\n",
> + wlc->pub->unit, __func__, request->alpha2);
> + }
> +
When we were having fun in staging GregKH indicated that use of likely()
should be justified with profiling data. Probably not really needed here.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 14:34 [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] brcm80211: smac: don't set up tx power limits during initialization Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] brcm80211: smac: always set channel specified by mac80211 Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] brcm80211: smac: remove unused code for 40MHz channels Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 15:37 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 15:49 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] brcm80211: smac: clean up channel.c Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:28 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-06-13 13:43 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 14:26 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:39 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-13 13:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 14:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] brcm80211: smac: don't validate channels against internal regulatory data Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] brcm80211: smac: use current regulatory domain when checking whether OFDM is allowed Seth Forshee
2012-06-12 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-13 13:50 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-16 11:57 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD85D47.8070609@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=kanyan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).