From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
"Kan Yan" <kanyan@broadcom.com>,
"Pieter-Paul Giesberts" <pieterpg@broadcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:57:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDC7495.7010900@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120613135007.GC3490@thinkpad-t410>
On 06/13/2012 03:50 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 04:34 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>> brcmsmac has its own internal regulatory implementation which attempts
>>> to enforce a Broadcom defined domain named X2. This code has no
>>> integration with mac80211 regulatory other than supplying regulatory
>>> hints, and thus each implementation operates independently of the other,
>>> enforcing conflicting sets of rules.
>>
>> Hi Seth,
>>
>> This series looks fine. I have sent two small comment replies on it.
>> Actually, only one reply is on the code change. I want to run some
>> testing today/tomorrow and let you know the results.
>
> Thanks! I'll wait for the test results before sending v3 patches.
Hi Seth,
Tested the v2 patches a couple of nights now so I think you can go about
sending the v3 series. Tested the patches on x86, x86_64, and ppc64.
Gr. AvS
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-16 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 14:34 [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] brcm80211: smac: don't set up tx power limits during initialization Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] brcm80211: smac: always set channel specified by mac80211 Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] brcm80211: smac: remove unused code for 40MHz channels Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 15:37 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 15:49 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] brcm80211: smac: clean up channel.c Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:28 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-13 13:43 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 14:26 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:39 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-13 13:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 14:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] brcm80211: smac: don't validate channels against internal regulatory data Seth Forshee
2012-06-05 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] brcm80211: smac: use current regulatory domain when checking whether OFDM is allowed Seth Forshee
2012-06-12 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-06-13 9:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-13 13:50 ` Seth Forshee
2012-06-16 11:57 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDC7495.7010900@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=kanyan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).