From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:1174 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756679Ab2FPL53 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:57:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4FDC7495.7010900@broadcom.com> (sfid-20120616_135804_517660_F25A64E0) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:57:09 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Seth Forshee" cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Brett Rudley" , "Roland Vossen" , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" , "Kan Yan" , "Pieter-Paul Giesberts" , "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support References: <1338906849-26135-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <4FD860DD.4060700@broadcom.com> <20120613135007.GC3490@thinkpad-t410> In-Reply-To: <20120613135007.GC3490@thinkpad-t410> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/13/2012 03:50 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 06/05/2012 04:34 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: >>> brcmsmac has its own internal regulatory implementation which attempts >>> to enforce a Broadcom defined domain named X2. This code has no >>> integration with mac80211 regulatory other than supplying regulatory >>> hints, and thus each implementation operates independently of the other, >>> enforcing conflicting sets of rules. >> >> Hi Seth, >> >> This series looks fine. I have sent two small comment replies on it. >> Actually, only one reply is on the code change. I want to run some >> testing today/tomorrow and let you know the results. > > Thanks! I'll wait for the test results before sending v3 patches. Hi Seth, Tested the v2 patches a couple of nights now so I think you can go about sending the v3 series. Tested the patches on x86, x86_64, and ppc64. Gr. AvS