From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, me@bobcopeland.com,
mickflemm@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] wireless: add CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:13:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDC7887.8090907@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6X=pO5c_yUqMmqU1jm92WJKqBbYioYm-2S4AYS2JXYRTA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/15/2012 06:53 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> So how about CONFIG_CFG80211_CERTIFICATION_ONUS which can be defined
> as an option for features / options whereby the onus for regulatory
> certification is being accepted by the option enabler? Pretty simple
> and to the point, and would allow for research code but also code
> whereby a bit more work is required on the enabler like DFS
> certification.
English is not my native language so I had to look up the meaning of the
word 'onus'. I guess I am fine with it.
Apart from the naming I addressed that if would be better to have it
device on CONFIG_WLAN instead of CFG80211 as it will be used to enable
802.11 device driver features. Any thoughts on that?
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-16 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-09 0:51 [RFC 0/3] wireless: add CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-09 0:51 ` [RFC 1/3] cfg80211: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-09 0:51 ` [RFC 2/3] ath5k: replace modparam_all_channels with CONFIG_ATH5K_TEST_CHANNELS Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-09 0:51 ` [RFC 3/3] ath9k: make CONFIG_ATH9K_DFS_CERTIFIED depend on CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-09 7:55 ` [RFC 0/3] wireless: add CONFIG_CFG80211_EXPERT Johannes Berg
2012-06-09 19:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-11 7:32 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-11 14:40 ` Kalle Valo
2012-06-11 14:45 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-11 15:46 ` Kalle Valo
2012-06-14 19:31 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-15 8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-15 8:21 ` Kalle Valo
2012-06-15 11:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-15 16:09 ` Kalle Valo
2012-06-15 16:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-06-16 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-06-18 15:37 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDC7887.8090907@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).