From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>,
"Stanislaw Gruszka" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [3.2.y] Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:51:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE0CA49.3030909@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120611031544.GB3092@burratino>
On 06/11/2012 05:15 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Decided to lookup this message and reply. Noticed it, but forgot to
follow up.
> Hi Arend et al,
>
> Quick puzzle for you. You like puzzles, right? ;-)
>From time to time, I do. When I get enough sleep ;-)
> As discussed at [1], Camaleón has been experiencing unwanted random
> wireless reconnects with various 3.2.y kernels up to and including
> 3.2.19:
>
> Camaleón wrote[3]:
>
>> What I get is the Network Manager window requesting for the
>> password confirm, randomly. If I delay the password confirmation, the
>> wireless connection drops.
>
> Newer kernels seemed to work better than old, so I asked her to apply
> the following patches agains the 3.2.y tree (the exact patches used
> are at [2]):
>
> 6b1a89afbf97 brcm80211: smac: drop "40MHz intolerant" flag from HT
> capability info
> c261bdf8acad brcm80211: smac: indicate severe problems to Mac80211
> 0bf1f883fd0a brcm80211: smac: removed MPC related code
> 4412953061de brcm80211: smac: removed MPC related variables
> 28237002e726 brcm80211: smac: removed down-on-watchdog MPC functionality
> 43ac09722f8e brcm80211: smac: removed down-on-rf-kill functionality
> a8bc4917ed6b brcm80211: smac: bugfix for tx mute in brcms_b_init()
> c6c44893c864 brcm80211: smac: fixed inconsistency in transmit mute
> 2646c46d5679 brcm80211: smac: modified Mac80211 callback interface
> dc460127898c brcm80211: smac: mute transmit on ops_start
> 1525662ac280 brcm80211: smac: changed check to confirm STA only support
> b7eec4233c34 brcm80211: smac: replace own access category definitions with
> mac80211 enum
> e9ca530a7b18 brcm80211: smac: don't modify sta parameters when adding sta
> 8906c43cb160 brcm80211: smac: fix channel frequency
> 02a588a2e3b9 brcm80211: smac: combine promiscuous mode functionality
> be667669ec01 brcm80211: smac: added support for mac80211 filter flags
> [d3f311349add brcm80211: fix usage of set tx power] --- unrelated, my mistake
> aa1f2f0a3218 brcm80211: smac: precendence bug in wlc_phy_attach()
> 1570e53c14ff brcm80211: smac: fix unintended fallthru in
> wlc_phy_radio_init_2057()
> 137dabed34a1 brcm80211: smac: remove smatch warnings from brcmsmac code
> 2b0a53d51b5f brcm80211: smac: only print block-ack timeout message at
> trace level
> 6b8da423315b brcm80211: smac: do not use US as fallback regulatory hint
> 94a2ca311cf4 brcm80211: smac: only provide valid regulatory hint
>
> The result was very nice --- the random reconnects went away.
If I remember correctly the random reconnects were caused by mac80211
flush callback.
> Here comes the puzzle --- which of those patches are responsible for
> the improvement?
My hunch based on what I found so far is that the patches mentioning the
word 'mute' could be key here.
> If it is not too invasive, we would like to test the responsible patch
> separately and submit it for inclusion in stable trees, hence the
> question. Incidentally, if any unrelated patches also seem like good
> stable candidates, that would be interesting to hear, too. (In other
> words, a brief description of the symptoms addressed by _any_ of the
> listed patches would be welcome.)
I really need to dive into the patches individually so it may take some
time.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKprTDFHmBuOorCo4evrYrNEi2-gJov0mQXQpEjoRJicfhWg=A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120530172713.GH3908@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGtvUFSBb_XK01bi6bJa3dynu73Lq-jTs=E78E3QwSqpA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120601174237.GA31781@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHepfbCKquvnG8CQ2=-tSNbgOSkT6R0GQmEx9UyuiZyMQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHQT8Oodh_YD5CWffSGJXAg-HgFMjR0STVgEZRxH4FaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120604084200.GA30645@tiikeri.vuoristo.local>
[not found] ` <20120604173121.GA9238@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <20120605050620.GC3118@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHGqDpdZY4ErZmPEc7Ur81GeQoH8tiAL5hrfhAE0RtbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-11 3:15 ` [3.2.y] Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression? Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 18:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 19:15 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-19 19:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 7:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-20 10:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-19 18:51 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-07-07 4:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-16 21:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-17 7:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-07-23 0:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-29 22:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
[not found] ` <20120610224902.GB3419@burratino>
[not found] ` <20120611063014.GA4579@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHYMyDwvxA52Z9zxP75ZUY5=FfCGPTZZg9ZxTxReFj7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120619180335.GA19354@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGM8TJC51Bqideeg447+qR5YnfihgORUFdJL_hW9YHiTw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-23 17:50 ` [3.2.y] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-24 9:41 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE0CA49.3030909@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noelamac@gmail.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).