From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stanislaw Gruszka" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [3.2.y] Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE0CFD4.4000300@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120619181522.GB19354@burratino>
On 06/19/2012 08:15 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>> As discussed at [1], Camaleón has been experiencing unwanted random
>> wireless reconnects with various 3.2.y kernels up to and including
>> 3.2.19:
>
> This was first reproduced on a kernel closely based on 3.2.9. It
> would typically happen pretty reliably once a day or so. Four days of
> testing a kernel close to 3.2.2 haven't triggered it again[1].
>
> The only brcm80211 change in that range is
>
> f96b08a7e6f6 brcmsmac: fix tx queue flush infinite loop
>
The WARN_ONCE added by the commit above still triggers sometimes. Two
recent commits I did regarding this are in 3.4-stable. Not sure if they
have been ported to 3.2 as well.
85091fc brcm80211: smac: fix endless retry of A-MPDU transmissions
badc4f0 brcm80211: smac: resume transmit fifo upon receiving frames
However, I still observe the warning so I am looking what other event
trigger this issue.
> So maybe the timeout is too short and this safety is tripping when it
> shouldn't. I've asked Camaleón to try a recent 3.2.y kernel with and
> without that commit reverted to test this guess.
>
> That leaves another mystery: which of the 22 changes listed at [2] was
> providing relief in earlier tests? E.g., does
>
>> c261bdf8acad brcm80211: smac: indicate severe problems to Mac80211
>
> make it easier to recover from this kind of error? Are there commands
> we should run or diagnostics to try to get a better sense of what is
> going on?
Not commends yet. We want to add debugfs support. The commit above only
notifies mac80211 that we have a problem. However, the recovery scenario
that mac80211 initiates upon this notification turns out to be killing
for brcmsmac.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKprTDFHmBuOorCo4evrYrNEi2-gJov0mQXQpEjoRJicfhWg=A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120530172713.GH3908@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGtvUFSBb_XK01bi6bJa3dynu73Lq-jTs=E78E3QwSqpA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120601174237.GA31781@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHepfbCKquvnG8CQ2=-tSNbgOSkT6R0GQmEx9UyuiZyMQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHQT8Oodh_YD5CWffSGJXAg-HgFMjR0STVgEZRxH4FaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120604084200.GA30645@tiikeri.vuoristo.local>
[not found] ` <20120604173121.GA9238@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <20120605050620.GC3118@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHGqDpdZY4ErZmPEc7Ur81GeQoH8tiAL5hrfhAE0RtbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-11 3:15 ` [3.2.y] Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression? Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 18:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 19:15 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-06-19 19:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 7:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-20 10:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-19 18:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-07-07 4:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-16 21:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-17 7:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-07-23 0:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-29 22:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
[not found] ` <20120610224902.GB3419@burratino>
[not found] ` <20120611063014.GA4579@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHYMyDwvxA52Z9zxP75ZUY5=FfCGPTZZg9ZxTxReFj7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120619180335.GA19354@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGM8TJC51Bqideeg447+qR5YnfihgORUFdJL_hW9YHiTw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-23 17:50 ` [3.2.y] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-24 9:41 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE0CFD4.4000300@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noelamac@gmail.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).