From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Victor Goldenshtein <victorg@ti.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com,
mcgrof@frijolero.org, adrian.chadd@gmail.com, j@w1.fi,
coelho@ti.com, assaf@ti.com, yoni.divinsky@ti.com, igalc@ti.com,
adrian@freebsd.org, nbd@nbd.name,
simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] nl80211/cfg80211: add ability to enable TX on op-channel
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE1B9CB.2090206@neratec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340181992.4655.39.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 06/20/2012 10:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:44 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> + if ((!chan->radar_detect_timeout ||
>>> + time_is_after_jiffies(chan->radar_detect_timeout)) &&
>>> + (chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR))
>>> + return -EPERM;
>>
>> Ok so you reject it if it's 0, but the jiffies calculation could return
>> 0 too.. in fact, since jiffies start at -5 minutes on boot, you might
>> even hit it if you start radar detection 4 minutes after boot.
>
> Also, it seems that the value should be reset eventually ... at least on
> interface down or so. Otherwise you can start CAC, then bring the
> interface down to stop the device, and then bring it back up (CAC check
> is no longer running) and then you can use the channel after some time
> even though you never really checked for radar...
>
No, if you bring it back up on the same DFS channel,
radar_detection_timeout will be set back to +60s by
start_radar_detection(). Looks safe to me.
> And if you start CAC on two different devices on the same channel, but
> they happen to share channel structs in the driver then this will all
> conflict quite badly.
>
Details ;) In fact, if you start device A at a DFS channel and device B
at the same channel 50secs later and device A did not detect radars
after 60secs, ideally both should get TX enabled at the same time with
B's CAC being aborted after 10secs.
For that radar_detect_timeout had to be per wiphy.
With the proposal here you have to wait for the last device to pass the
CAC and if you alternatively put devices A and B up and down every
30secs you can effectively prevent them from TXing forever.
>
> This needs a lot of more thinking it seems.
>
> johannes
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 13:10 [PATCH v2 1/7] nl80211/cfg80211: add radar detection command/event Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-19 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mac80211: " Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-20 8:40 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-19 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] nl80211/cfg80211: add ability to enable TX on op-channel Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-20 8:44 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 8:46 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 11:53 ` Zefir Kurtisi [this message]
2012-06-20 11:57 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 12:58 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-06-20 13:12 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 13:32 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-20 14:18 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 13:38 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-06-20 14:19 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 15:06 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-20 14:34 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-19 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mac80211: " Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-19 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] nl80211/cfg80211: add ap channel switch command/event Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-20 8:47 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 17:17 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-20 17:39 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-21 5:35 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-21 7:06 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-19 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mac80211: " Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-20 8:48 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-19 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mac80211: add DFS support to monitor interface Victor Goldenshtein
2012-06-20 8:49 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 16:50 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-20 8:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] nl80211/cfg80211: add radar detection command/event Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 12:22 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-06-20 12:29 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-20 16:42 ` Goldenshtein, Victor
2012-06-20 17:40 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE1B9CB.2090206@neratec.com \
--to=zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com \
--cc=adrian.chadd@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=assaf@ti.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=igalc@ti.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@frijolero.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=victorg@ti.com \
--cc=yoni.divinsky@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).