From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>,
"Stanislaw Gruszka" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [3.2.y] Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:41:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE6E0D3.8050704@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120623175040.GE2495@burratino>
On 06/23/2012 07:50 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Camaleón wrote[1]:
>> 2012/6/19 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
>>> Camaleón wrote:
>
>>>> Update: I've been running kernel 3.2.2-1 over 4 days (since last
>>>> Saturday until today) and still haven't experienced any disconnection.
>>>
>>> Interesting. I wonder if the workaround in f96b08a7e6f6 (brcmsmac:
>>> fix tx queue flush infinite loop, 2012-01-17) has too short a timeout
>>> and is backfiring.
>>
>> Mmm...
>>
>>> How about this patch, for 3.2.y kernels? I suggest the following
>>> steps for testing:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed steps.
>>
>> I've planned to start debugging over the weekend because I have more
>> spare time for this but the last (yesterday?) set of updates for
>> wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M
>> is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail-notification
>> are segfaulting as crazy horses.
>>
>> I'm attaching the syslog.
>>
>> There is also a "new" segfault coming from "net/wireless/mlme.c" (I
>> say "new" because I don't recall this file was involved in the past
>> :-?) so given the current state of the system I'm a bit reluctant of
>> running more test at least for now. Let's see if an upcoming update
>> restores the sanity to the system. I'll keep you informed.
>
> Just realized upstream was not in the cc. Moving to there.
>
> If I understand correctly, these symptoms are similar to those you
> experienced with 3.2.9-1. So there is no reason to believe
> f96b08a7e6f6 is the source of the trouble after all. The problem must
> originate somewhere else. Right?
>
> Syslog at [1].
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=230;bug=664767
>
> [...]
>> Jun 23 12:43:28 stt300 kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.2.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.2.2-1) (ben@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-12) ) #1 SMP Wed Feb 1 09:39:41 UTC 2012
> [...]
>> Jun 23 12:44:37 stt300 NetworkManager[1478]: <info> Activation (wlan0/wireless): connection 'WLAN_B5' has security, and secrets exist. No new secrets needed.
> [...]
>> Jun 23 12:44:38 stt300 kernel: [ 88.476883] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> [...]
>> Jun 23 12:44:40 stt300 dhclient: bound to 192.168.0.150 -- renewal in 123164 seconds.
> [...]
>> Jun 23 12:59:05 stt300 wpa_supplicant[1514]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:23:f8:9d:ad:11 [GTK=TKIP]
> [...]
>> Jun 23 13:14:41 stt300 wpa_supplicant[1514]: wlan0: WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:23:f8:9d:ad:11 [PTK=TKIP GTK=TKIP]
> [...]
>> Jun 23 13:29:05 stt300 wpa_supplicant[1514]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:23:f8:9d:ad:11 [GTK=TKIP]
> [...]
>> Jun 23 13:41:44 stt300 kernel: [ 3513.868441] ieee80211 phy0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos enabled: false (implement)
>> Jun 23 13:41:44 stt300 kernel: [ 3513.868462] ieee80211 phy0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: disassociated
>> Jun 23 13:41:44 stt300 kernel: [ 3513.868478] ieee80211 phy0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp filtering: enabled false, count 1 (implement)
>> Jun 23 13:41:45 stt300 wpa_supplicant[1514]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:23:f8:9d:ad:11 reason=4
This means AP is not receiving anything from this machine.
>> Jun 23 13:41:45 stt300 kernel: [ 3514.806036] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
> [...]
>> Jun 23 13:41:45 stt300 kernel: [ 3514.825799] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: ES
>> Jun 23 13:41:45 stt300 kernel: [ 3514.840865] cfg80211: Regulatory domain changed to country: ES
> [...]
I am curious how the system would behave if you select US instead ES
country.
Gr. AvS
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-24 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKprTDFHmBuOorCo4evrYrNEi2-gJov0mQXQpEjoRJicfhWg=A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120530172713.GH3908@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGtvUFSBb_XK01bi6bJa3dynu73Lq-jTs=E78E3QwSqpA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120601174237.GA31781@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHepfbCKquvnG8CQ2=-tSNbgOSkT6R0GQmEx9UyuiZyMQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHQT8Oodh_YD5CWffSGJXAg-HgFMjR0STVgEZRxH4FaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120604084200.GA30645@tiikeri.vuoristo.local>
[not found] ` <20120604173121.GA9238@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <20120605050620.GC3118@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHGqDpdZY4ErZmPEc7Ur81GeQoH8tiAL5hrfhAE0RtbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-11 3:15 ` [3.2.y] Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression? Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 18:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-19 19:15 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-19 19:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 7:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-20 10:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-20 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-19 18:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-07-07 4:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-16 21:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-17 7:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-07-23 0:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-29 22:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
[not found] ` <20120610224902.GB3419@burratino>
[not found] ` <20120611063014.GA4579@stt008.linux.site>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDHYMyDwvxA52Z9zxP75ZUY5=FfCGPTZZg9ZxTxReFj7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120619180335.GA19354@burratino>
[not found] ` <CAKprTDGM8TJC51Bqideeg447+qR5YnfihgORUFdJL_hW9YHiTw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-23 17:50 ` [3.2.y] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-24 9:41 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE6E0D3.8050704@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noelamac@gmail.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).